Germany
Germany offers the largest domestic market in the EU and excellent banking access through BaFin supervision. With 45 licensed CASPs — by far the most in the EU — Germany has attracted heavyweights such as Bitpanda, Trade Republic, N26, Commerzbank, and Bullish Europe. However, BaFin is notoriously thorough, timelines can exceed 12 months, and all communications must be in German.
France
France offers excellent banking access and a mature financial ecosystem. The AMF is a respected regulator, and France's shorter transitional period signals its commitment to rapid MiCA adoption. With 12 licensed CASPs, France has attracted major players including Circle (the issuer of USDC and EURC) and Société Générale Forge. Best suited for larger companies with the resources to maintain significant local presence.
Cyprus
Cyprus has long been a popular jurisdiction for financial services companies. CySEC accepts English, and the country offers moderate substance requirements and a favorable tax environment. With 8 licensed CASPs under MiCA — including eToro, Revolut, and Trading 212 — Cyprus is proving a popular choice for consumer-facing platforms. A strong choice for companies already familiar with the CySEC regulatory approach.
Austria
Austria provides a solid financial infrastructure and good banking access through the FMA. With 7 licensed CASPs, Austria has attracted notable names including Bitpanda, Bybit EU, and KuCoin EU. Particularly well-suited for companies targeting the DACH region (Germany, Austria, Switzerland).
Spain
Spain is building its crypto regulatory infrastructure through the CNMV. The country offers moderate substance requirements and connections to Latin America that offer unique strategic advantages.
Luxembourg
Luxembourg is the jurisdiction of choice for institutional-grade crypto operations. The CSSF is a highly respected regulator with unmatched banking infrastructure. However, timelines are long and costs are at the upper end of the range.
Lithuania
Lithuania remains the most popular jurisdiction for crypto startups and mid-size companies seeking a MiCA license. The Bank of Lithuania accepts English-language submissions, offers competitive processing times of 3 to 5 months, and the country provides a cost-effective operating environment with a well-established fintech ecosystem. With only 3 licensed CASPs so far under MiCA, Lithuania is still in the early stages of its transition — the country was dominant under the previous VASP regime, and most existing operators are now converting to full MiCA authorization. Learn more about crypto licensing in Lithuania.
Estonia
Estonia is known for its digital-first governance and was one of the earliest EU countries to establish a crypto licensing framework. Under MiCA, Estonia has not adopted grandfathering provisions, meaning all providers must apply for full CASP authorization. The FSA enforces strict substance requirements, but the jurisdiction's reputation for digital innovation continues to attract serious crypto businesses. Learn more about crypto licensing in Estonia.
Poland
Poland is an increasingly attractive option for MiCA licensing, offering a cost-effective environment and a growing crypto ecosystem. The KNF has been actively preparing for MiCA implementation, and Poland's large domestic market adds appeal for companies seeking a Central European presence. As of February 2026, no CASPs have been licensed under MiCA in Poland yet — the KNF is still ramping up its authorization process, which may present an opportunity for early movers. Learn more about crypto licensing in Poland.
Czech Republic
The Czech Republic offers a straightforward licensing process, reasonable costs, and a central EU location. The Czech National Bank has demonstrated a pragmatic approach to crypto regulation, and Prague has emerged as a significant European tech hub. Like Poland, the Czech Republic has 0 licensed CASPs under MiCA so far — the CNB is still finalizing its authorization procedures. Learn more about crypto licensing in Czech Republic.